Tagged: fcc Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

 
  • isoc-ny 3:23 am on March 17, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , fcc,   

    ISOC-NY member Elizabeth Stark puts the FCC Chairman on the spot!! 

    Chairman Genachowski answered Brooklyn-ite Elizabeth Stark’s question on cost by saying the FCC needs to eliminate all barriers to competition so more Interent providers can compete and drive down prices.

    via You and the FCC Chairman discuss the Future of the Internet

     
  • isoc-ny 2:15 am on March 13, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: broadbcnd, fcc,   

    National Broadband Plan – some key concepts: more unlicensed spectrum, 100 Squared, Digital Literacy Corps #fcc #NBP 

    A NY Times story today about the forthcoming National Broadband Plan introduces some of the key concepts therein:

    ‘More unlicensed spectrum’
    The plan will advise that some of more spectrum become unlicensed, so it can serve as a test bed for new technologies.
    ‘100 Squared’
    The plan will include an initiative the chairman calls 100 Squared — equipping 100 million households with high-speed Internet gushing through their pipes at 100 megabits a second by the end of this decade. .
    ‘Digital Literacy Corps’
    The plan will call for a “digital literacy corps” to help unwired Americans learn online skills
     
  • isoc-ny 1:28 am on March 12, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , fcc   

    Video: ITIF Event with Blair Levin + National Purposes team – #broadband #fcc 

    Congress has insisted that the national broadband plan specifically address “national purposes” – job creation and economic growth, consumer welfare, civic participation, public safety and homeland security, health care, energy independence and efficiency, and other issues.

    On Mar 11 2010 the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation hosted the FCC team tasked with implementing these purposes.

    Slides are here.

     
    • joly 8:46 am on March 12, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Nice point about proprietary systems hindering online health care data applications

      P.22 – in Education “Simplify copyright regime to encourage contributions”

      p.34 “Federal grants encourage the development of duplicative, stove-piped broadband networks”

      1:47:00 digital signatures – report coming

  • isoc-ny 2:43 pm on March 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: fcc,   

    FCC transparency / expertise questioned – “quite appalling” 

    A report about an FCC transparency meeting last week:

    As a result of the clubby atmosphere of Washington telecom circles, the FCC is considered by some to be one of the most heavily lobbied agencies in the federal government and has been widely criticized for the revolving door that sees departing commission officials land top policy spots at the cable and telecom companies it regulates.

    “There’s been concern about undue influence at the FCC,” said Matthew Hussey, a telecom advisor to Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine). “That really resulted in the erosion of trust with the public with the courts and with Congress.”

    Susan Crawford, a former technology advisor to President Obama who currently teaches law at the University of Michigan, put it a little more bluntly.

    “Like all independent agencies the FCC is subject to political power,” Crawford said. “To an outsider who has no experience in telecom it’s really quite appalling.”

    Schlick and Mary Beth Richards, the special counsel at the FCC who is spearheading the reform effort, noted that the commission recently began a proceeding to reform its ex parte rules, which require disclosures about private meetings or written exchanges with commission staffers. The revised ex parte rules would mandate that anyone who meets with FCC officials disclose the subject of the conversation, rather than simply documenting that the meeting occurred.

    “The record would show what was covered in the meeting, and we think that’s very important to reform,” Schlick said.

    But that’s small solace to outspoken critics of industry pressure on the commission. Mark Cooper, director of research at the Consumer Federation of America, warned that no amount of ex parte disclosure requirements will curb the outsized influence well-heeled firms and trade associations exert on FCC officials.

    “Ex parte communications are an affront to democracy. They are simply an insult,” Cooper said. “Why this agency needs to have everything explained to it by an army of industry lobbyists is beyond me.”

    The article goes on to note that Olympia Snowe recently introduced a bill to shake up the FCC’s technical staff.

     
  • isoc-ny 4:03 pm on March 4, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , fcc,   

    Technology Policy Institute – The FCC’s National Broadband Plan: The Early Reaction 

    Date: Tuesday, March 23, 2010

    Time: 8:30 AM – 12:30 PM

    Location: National Press Club, First Amendment Lounge, Washington DC

    The Georgetown Center for Business and Public Policy and the Technology Policy Institute have convened experts from industry, academia and government to provide an early reaction to the FCC’s  National Broadband Plan, scheduled to be released on March 17.  The participants will focus on the following major questions:

    What are the plan’s effects on innovation and investment?

    What are the plan’s effects on penetration to underserved populations?

    via Technology Policy Institute – The FCC’s National Broadband Plan: The Early Reaction.

     
  • isoc-ny 5:11 am on December 25, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , fcc   

    Blair Levin interview on CSPAN 

    FCC Broadband Plan supremo Blair Levin was interviewed on CSPAN on Dec 21.

    Interviewer Amy Schatz has written a summary in the Wall Street Journal.

     
    • Joly MacFie 5:14 am on December 25, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      What made my jaw drop in Levin’s remarks were that, while summarily ruling out structural/functional separation, he happily foresaw a future for most US citizens where the choice was between 50mpbs wireline as an offering of cable companies via DOCSIS3, and wireless 5mpbs via the phone companies. In his opinion it is quite possible that many will decide that 5mpbs is quite satisfactory.

      Echoes of 640k enough for anybody?

      In fact wireline just does not seem to be a big concern, seen more as a lifeline. I note his 2006 remarks to the Judiciary Committee:
      “Given where we are, it is likely that the only way to drive more, bigger, cheaper, and ubiquitous broadband is through new, probably wireless, broadband facilities.”
      http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/testimony.cfm?id=1937&wit_id=5421

      It appears little has occurred at the FCC to change his mind.

  • c
    Compose new post
    j
    Next post/Next comment
    k
    Previous post/Previous comment
    r
    Reply
    e
    Edit
    o
    Show/Hide comments
    t
    Go to top
    l
    Go to login
    h
    Show/Hide help
    shift + esc
    Cancel