ISOC LIVE NOTICEBOARD

Tagged: right to be forgotten Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

• 

  ISOC Live 12:22 pm on March 20, 2024 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: columbiagfoe ( 5 ), right to be forgotten   

  WEBCAST MAR 20 – Tendances mondiales du droit à l’oubli / Global Trends in the Right to be Forgotten 

  On Wednesday March 20 2024 at 12:00 EDT (16:00 UTC) Columbia Global Freedom of Expression presents a webinar ‘Global Trends in the Right to be Forgotten‘

  How has the so-called Right to be Forgotten evolved over the last decade since the landmark ruling Google Spain SL v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos in 2014? Global Freedom of Expression will report the findings of a Special Collection paper ‘Does our past have a right to be forgotten by the Internet?‘, which surveyed jurisprudence around the world to understand how courts in different jurisdictions have understood and adjudicated these rights claims. French legal scholars will present recent case law from French courts to illustrate emerging norms. The panelists from France and Argentina will discuss the complexities and impacts of de-indexing, deleting, or anonymizing content, and how judges around the globe are dealing with the challenges posed by the social processes of memory and forgetting on the Internet. They will also consider trends in legal reasoning when it comes to balancing freedom of expression with privacy, intermediary liability, reputation, and the special duties of public figures.

  Le mercredi 20 mars 2024, Columbia Global Freedom of Expression présente un webinaire « Tendances mondiales en matière de droit à l’oubli ».

  Comment le soi-disant droit à l’oubli a-t-il évolué au cours de la dernière décennie depuis l’arrêt historique Google Spain SL c. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos en 2014 ? Global Freedom of Expression rapportera les conclusions d’un article de la collection spéciale « Notre passé a-t-il le droit d’être oublié par Internet ? », qui a étudié la jurisprudence à travers le monde pour comprendre comment les tribunaux de différentes juridictions ont compris et statué sur ces revendications de droits. Des juristes français présenteront la jurisprudence récente des tribunaux français pour illustrer les normes émergentes. Les panélistes de France et d’Argentine discuteront des complexités et des impacts de la désindexation, de la suppression ou de l’anonymisation du contenu, et de la manière dont les juges du monde entier font face aux défis posés par les processus sociaux de mémoire et d’oubli sur Internet. Ils examineront également les tendances du raisonnement juridique lorsqu’il s’agit de concilier la liberté d’expression avec la vie privée, la responsabilité des intermédiaires, la réputation et les devoirs particuliers des personnalités publiques.

  INTRODUCTION
  Anderson Javiel Dirocie De León, Legal and Program Consultant, Global Freedom of Expression / consultant juridique et programmatique, Liberté d’expression mondiale

  PANEL
  Frédéric Gras, Attorney at Law, Bar of Paris / Avocat au Barreau de Paris
  Ramiro Alvarez Ugarte, Vice-Director, Center for Studies on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information in Argentina (CELE) / vice-directeur du Centre d’études sur la liberté d’expression et l’accès à l’information en Argentine (CELE)
  Moderator: Basile Ader, former President of the Bar of Paris / ancien Bâtonnier du Barreau de Paris

  EDIT (EN/FR CAPTIONS)
  

  LIVESTREAMS
  https://livestream.com/internetsociety/gfoe-right-to-be-forgotten (EN)
  https://youtu.be/4f3G2KCVEhs (Floor language)

  TRANSCRIPT EN / FR

  TWITTER #rightobeforgotten @ColumbiaGFoE @article19wafric @ramiroau @CELEUP ,Frédéric Gras @AndersonDiroci @BasileAder #BarreaudeParis

  SIMULCASTS
  https://twitter.com/ISOC_Live
  https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive
  https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc/

  ARCHIVE
  https://archive.org/details/gfoe-right-to-be-forgotten

  Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
   

  Reply Cancel reply

  Required fields are marked *

  Name *

  Email *

  Website

  Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

  Notify me of new posts by email.

  Δ

  This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

• 

  isoc-ny 6:26 pm on March 11, 2015 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: google ( 22 ), ig2us ( 2 ), right to be forgotten, zittrain ( 9 )   

  WEBCAST TODAY: @IQ2US Debate “The U.S. Should Adopt the “Right to Be Forgotten” Online w/ @zittrain #RightToBeForgotten 

  Today Wednesday March 11 2015 at 6:45pm EDT Intelligence Squared will host a debate – The U.S. Should Adopt the “Right to Be Forgotten – at the Kaufman Center in NYC. In 2014, the European Union’s Court of Justice determined that individuals have a right to be forgotten, “the right—under certain conditions—to ask search engines to remove links with personal information about them.” It is not absolute, but meant to be balanced against other fundamental rights, like freedom of expression. In a half year following the Court’s decision, Google received over 180,000 removal requests. Of those reviewed and processed, 40.5% were granted. Largely seen as a victory in Europe, in the U.S., the reaction has been overwhelmingly negative. Was this ruling a blow to free speech and public information, or a win for privacy and human dignity? For: Paul Nemitz, Dir. of Fundamental Rights & Citizenship, DG Justice & Consumers, EU Commission; Eric Posner, Professor of Law, University of Chicago. Against: Andrew McLaughlin, CEO, Digg and Instapaper & Fmr. Dir. of Global Public Policy, Google; Jonathan Zittrain, Professor, Harvard Law & Co-Founder, Berkman Center for Internet & Society. The vent will be webcast live via fora.tv

  What: The U.S. Should Adopt the “Right to Be Forgotten
  Where: Kaufman Center in NYC
  When: Wednesday March 11 2015 at 6:45pm EDT | 00:45 UTC
  Webcast: http://library.fora.tv/event/the_us_should_adopt_the_right_to_be_forgotten_online/watchlive
  Twitter: #RightToBeForgotten

  Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

  joly is discussing. Toggle Comments

   
  • 

    joly 3:48 pm on March 13, 2015 Permalink | Reply

    The video of this debate is being held for a DVD, but a transcript is available

    • 3/12 Jeff John Roberts The right to be forgotten from Google? Forget it, says U.S. crowd (Fortune)
• 

  isoc-ny 2:30 pm on August 11, 2014 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: europe ( 13 ), ICAC ( 6 ), mike godwin ( 3 ), netcaucus ( 12 ), privacy ( 67 ), right to be forgotten   

  VIDEO: Can Europe Force Internet Censorship? Assessing the Right to be Forgotten @NetCaucusAC #euforgotten 

  On August 8 2014 the Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee (ICAC) hosted a panel Can Europe Force Search Engines to Censor Information You’re Looking for on the Internet? Assessing the Right to be Forgotten. Europe’s new privacy right clashes with other deeply held values such as freedom of expression and transparency. Many observers are concerned that the EU’s approach could even affect American Internet users. EU privacy regulators have suggested that the search engines must delete results not only within the EU, but globally, in spite of our First Amendment rights to publish and view the information. Is the right to be forgotten necessary to protect privacy, or does the EU rule go too far? Should the EU be able to limit access to information by American Internet users? Can the right to be forgotten be reconciled with the watchdog role of the press when public figures can use the new procedures to censor potentially embarrassing information?  Speakers: Mike Godwin, Senior Policy Advisor, Internews; Joe Jerome, Policy Counsel, Future of Privacy Forum; Emma Llansó, Director of CDT’s Project on Free Expression, Center for Democracy and Technology; Rob Pegoraro, Columnist, Yahoo Tech; David Hoffman, Director of Security Policy and Global Privacy Officer, Intel. Moderator: Michael Kubayanda, Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee. Video/audio is below. Closed captions are available.

  

  View on CSPAN: http://www.c-span.org/video/?320532-1/discussion-nsa-surveillance-programs
  Audio: http://www.netcaucus.org/wp-content/uploads/20140808euforgotten.mp3
  Twitter: #euforgotten

  Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)