11:52 am on December 16, 2013 · gtld (4), isocdc (1), new gtlds (9)

WEBCAST TODAY: The Impact of gTLDs on the Internet @isocdc #newgtlds #icann #beyondthedot

The Impact of gTLDs on the Internet

The Impact of gTLDs on the InternetToday, Monday December 16 2013 from noon til 2pm EST, the Greater Washington DC Chapter of the Internet Society (ISOC-DC) will host a panel – The Impact of gTLDs on the Internet. The event is intended to raise awareness of and encourage discussion about gTLDs, specifically the ways in which the addition of new gTLDs will impact the Internet. Perspectives will include those of applicants for new gTLDs, root zone operators, ISPs as well as those involved in Internet Governance. Panelists: Dr. Burt Kaliski – Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer, Verisign, Inc.; Sarah Deutsch – Vice President and General Counsel, Verizon Communications ; Taylor Frank – Vice President, Strategy and Development, FairWinds Partners ; Jon Nevett – Co-Founder and Executive Vice President, Donuts, Inc. ; and Andrew Mack – Founder, AM Global Consulting. Moderator is David McAuley, Bloomberg BNA. The event will be webcast live on the Internet Society livestream channel.

What: The Impact of gTLDs on the Internet
Where: Busboys and Poets, Washington, DC
When: Monday December 16 2013 12-2pm EST | 1700-1900 UTC
Webcast: http://new.livestream.com/internetsociety/gtlds
Twitter: #isocdc | #beyondthedot

ICE seeking extraditions of foreign website owners #copyright #netfreedom

Peter Walker of UK newspaper The Guardian reports that United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) is looking to extradite owners of websites it believes are breaking US copyrights – even if their servers are not based in America or are legal in their own countries. The rationale is that the use of generic top level domain names like .com and .net, administered by Verisign in the US, provides “nexus” thus giving them jurisdiction. At issue is the case of tvshack.net – a linking site run by British student Richard O’Dwyer. The domain already was seized by ICE. O’Dwyer now faces extradition. Walker quotes ICE Assistant director Erik Barnett:

“Without wishing to get into the particulars of any case, the general goal of law enforcement is to arrest and prosecute individuals who are committing crimes. That is our goal, our mission. The idea is to try to prosecute.”

On linking:

“I’ll give you an analogy. A lot of drug dealing is done by proxy – you rarely give the money to the same person that you get the dope from. I think the question is, are any of these people less culpable?”

In England there are calls to amend the extradition agreement with the US so that a UK judge can decide jurisdiction on individual cases..

3:27 pm on May 16, 2011 · .net (1), gtld (4), ICANN (193), NARALO (16), Verisign (2)

Last minute surge of opposition to Verisign .net auto renewal #ICANN

At-Large

At-LargeThe current .NET Registry Agreement between ICANN and Verisign is due to expire on 30 June 2011. On April 11 2011 ICANN posted a proposed draft renewal agreement for public comment. Under the terms of the existing agreement, which contracted a 6 year term starting July 1 2005, renewal is automatic unless Verisign commits some egregious breach of terms. Although ICANN has made some tweaks this clause (4.2) is unchanged in the new draft.

In 2002 Verisign, which had in 2000 purchased the .com, .net, and .org registries agreed, under pressure from ICANN, to give up .org, and to compete on equal terms for the renewal .net in 2005 and .com in 2007 (.org eventually ended up being operated by the Public Interest Registry (PIR) on behalf of the Internet Society).

However Verisign still held an ace – it operated the root zone and, as they say, possession is nine/tenths of the law. Starting in 2004 Verisign also launched a barrage of lawsuits against ICANN, essentially challenging its authority and crippling it financially.

In early 2005, the ‘competitive process’ to assign .net took place. Verisign – in what was described as a deeply flawed process – won. Then, in October 2005, came the ‘monster deal‘ – Verisign dropped it’s lawsuits, gave up control of the root, and agreed to regulation of “non-registry services” in return for renewed 6 year contracts on .com and .net. What evidently wasn’t apparent at the time – as nobody appears to have commented on it, was that the wording in these contracts actually gave them control in perpetuity.

Thus, when the draft renewal agreement was announced in April 2011 it received little attention. However in just the last few days – the deadline for public comment was May 10 – suddenly a flurry of comment appeared. Correspondence, especially out of the North American Regional At-Large Organization (NARALO), of which ISOC-NY is an At-Large Structure, noted that under the 2009 Affirmation of Commitments that gave ICANN its independence, it undertook to make decisions solely in the public interest through a multi-stakeholder bottom-up policy development model. It was also noted that ICANN’s partner in the AoC, the United States National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) has itself recently demanded that ICANN perform economic studies before any further delegation of top level domains (TLDs) and also that ICANN provide “a thorough and reasoned explanation of decisions taken“.

At the monthly NARALO monthly meeting on May 9 the issue was raised of questioning the automatic renewal or, at least the renewal of the automatic renewal clause in the new contract, and also asking ICANN to clarify the process by which it came to be in the first place. There was enough concern expressed at the meeting  that Olivier Crepin-Leblond, chair of the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) moved rapidly to contact the ICANN board support staff and gain a window – an extension until May 18 – for the ALAC to gather input from the At-Large community for a statement to present to the board in advance of its retreat May 20 -21 2011.

The draft of the statement is at https://community.icann.org/x/noHg – if you have further comments they can be added there (or below).  The deadline is tomorrow May 17 2011.

 

7:37 pm on December 18, 2009 · gtld (4), ICANN (193), newgtlds (19)

New gTLD Program — ICANN Proposes Draft Expression of Interest / Pre-Registrations Model

18 December 2009 ICANN is publishing today for public comment a draft model for soliciting Expressions of Interest for new generic top-level domains (new gTLDs) [PDF, 192K]. According to this EOI / pre-registration model, entities interested in participating in the first round of the New gTLD Program are required to submit basic information about the participating entity and the requested top-level domain, also referred to as “string”.

Read more